« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Petraeus: "Astonishing Signs of Normalcy"?

General David Petraeus, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, is the man everyone's watching. Petraeus has a deserved reputation for clarity and honesty, something I've observed firsthand on two occasions I've had to interview him. His status assessment on the surge, slated to be delivered to congress in September, will be a political milestone for how Washington views the war, and so there's no shortage of speculation about what message Petraeus will deliver. If it's anything like his interviewwith USA Today, though, expect his briefing to accentuate the positive.

On a day when the bombing of a Shiite shrine in Samarra threatened to reignite sectarian chaos, Petraeus gave a curious description of Baghdad to the paper:

If you drive around Baghdad, you'll find astonishing signs of normalcy in perhaps half to two-thirds of the city. … In fact, the car bomb numbers have come down fairly steadily as well until just a couple of days ago, and we'll see if we can get those coming down again. …

There's a real vibrancy in certain parts of Iraq, and in others obviously there is continued fighting and a sectarian cycle of violence underway. Obviously, there is damage, a need to … help them stitch back the fabric of society that was torn during the height of the sectarian violence.

When I was in Baghdad in March, I saw normalcy myself, but I also saw a police force infiltrated with Shiite militias and a city teeming with tension. His interview came right as Baghdad instituted a total vehicular curfew, a number of Sunni mosques were bombedin retaliation for Samarra, and Iraq waits to see how bad the fallout from the attack will be. If that wasn't enough, the Pentagon's latest quarterly report on Iraq shows no decrease in violence, despite the arrival of Petraeus as commander and a 30,000-troop reinforcement. Suggesting that the "vibrancy" of certain parts of Iraq is as significant as this larger picture risks diminishing Petraeus's hard-won credibility for the first time in his career.


Comments (214)

penalcolony wrote on June 14, 2007 11:37 AM:

Take it from someone who spent his first eighteen years as an Army brat; the first word in "career military" is always "career" . . .

Punchy wrote on June 14, 2007 11:38 AM:

Wow, the million$ of dollar$ I would make if there was a website somewhere where I could bet on whether or not The General will give an honest view, or a ridiculously rosy, upbeat view.

The odds on "rosy" would have to be 1-1,000,000 at least.

Bearpaw wrote on June 14, 2007 11:41 AM:

Redefining normal again, I see.

eyeball wrote on June 14, 2007 11:50 AM:

they're back to a normal level of car bombings and kidnap-torture-murders. must be nice for them. the food markets and mosques blow up just once a week, 'stead of twice. bearpaw beat me to it: 'defining normalcy down.'

snarfle wrote on June 14, 2007 11:50 AM:

Petraeus... when will we learn... doesn't anybody remember he's the clown sent over to Iraq to train the Iraqi replacement army.. and failed so miserably? You wanna believe anything that jerk says?

NCBlueneck wrote on June 14, 2007 11:51 AM:

I guess blowing up mosques and open civil war is becoming "astonishingly normal" alright! The "rosey scenario" is getting so old it's really starting to stink. When do we get some "reality based community" people in command?

Scott L wrote on June 14, 2007 11:54 AM:

And the band played on.

Anne wrote on June 14, 2007 11:54 AM:

Oh, come on…this is like the abused wife who thinks things are better because her husband is only beating her every other day with the stick – the other days he’s still using his fists.

I suppose if you’re the guy who wrote the filed manual on counter-insurgency, you have a desire to implement your theories in a real situation. And I guess if you wrote the book, you have a vested interest in succeeding, which means you are more likely to see success when it isn’t there.

Petraeus’ inherent conflict of interest means that he should not be the one who assesses whether this surge is working.

Scott L wrote on June 14, 2007 11:55 AM:

And the band played on.

collar wrote on June 14, 2007 12:00 PM:

You know, there is civil/sectarian unrest throughout the region now. It's all the rage!! Everyone wants in on it. Why look at Gaza, Lebanon...

Kathy wrote on June 14, 2007 12:06 PM:

It's astonishingly normal for military leaders to lie through their teeth.

orionATL wrote on June 14, 2007 12:09 PM:

when are you all going to report on von spakovsky's appearance before a senate committee yesterday.

lampwick wrote on June 14, 2007 12:21 PM:

"If you drive around Baghdad, you'll find astonishing signs of normalcy in perhaps half to two-thirds of the city. … In fact, the car bomb numbers have come down fairly steadily as well until just a couple of days ago, and we'll see if we can get those coming down again. …"

Reverse-Orwell transcription:

"Recently I went on an inspection of Baghdad, wearing a helmet and bulletproof vest, surrounded by over one hundred soldiers, six Bradleys and ten Blackhawks. In precisely one-quarter of the city I saw occasional indications that not all Iraqis were living like prisoners in their own homes: I saw a man dumping feces into the street, a vender hawking car parts (some of which appeared oddly twisted and soot-covered), and a ten-year old girl in a miniskirt holding up a sign written in red lipstick - although it was in Arabic that I could not read.... Car bombings dropped from 93 per month to 92 per month during the last week of May, although they rose to 30 per week during the first two weeks of June. I told my officer who keeps track of the statistics to see if any of those cars might have actually have exploded due to faulty ignition wiring or other problems relating to poor maintenance."

wglad wrote on June 14, 2007 12:23 PM:

Reminds me of Westmoreland.

linda wrote on June 14, 2007 12:27 PM:

how many rugs and pairs of sunglasses has the general purchased....

wglad wrote on June 14, 2007 12:33 PM:

"Obviously, there is damage, a need to … help them stitch back the fabric of society that was torn during the height of the sectarian violence."

Guess he's saying the worse is over? Amazing.

code = public as in government is a game to which the public is not invited.

Chesire11 wrote on June 14, 2007 12:42 PM:

Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.

As anyone could have predicted, the first casualty of Petraeus' association with Bush and Cheney is his integrity.

Peter Principle wrote on June 14, 2007 12:55 PM:

Looks like the pod people got him. I think Lieberman carried it over on his last trip to Iraq.

Anonymous wrote on June 14, 2007 1:02 PM:

Petraeus: Mouth open,

Kool Aid: In

Repeat.

John S wrote on June 14, 2007 1:06 PM:

Commenter Anne got it right. Conflict of interest. He wrote the book. If he can't control the insurgency using the strategies he outlined, that doesn't look so good, does it.

Wanna bet that's one of the reasons he got the job? He's in the same bed with Bush. There is no Plan B.

Some Guy wrote on June 14, 2007 1:21 PM:

How closely does General Petraeus follow his own guidelines with regard to counter-insurgency and occupation? I'm fairly certain the troop levels don't. Any ideas?

Some Guy wrote on June 14, 2007 1:22 PM:

Petraeus wrote an army field manual: How closely does General Petraeus follow his own guidelines with regard to counter-insurgency and occupation? I'm fairly certain the troop levels don't. Any ideas?

Anonymous wrote on June 14, 2007 1:27 PM:

Counter insurgency isn't going to work in Iraq: this is something different, a civil war.

The error isn't just the failed US response, but when it adjusted, still applying the wrong model.

Two wrongs don't fix Iraq.

benjoya wrote on June 14, 2007 1:33 PM:

If he can't control the insurgency using the strategies he outlined, that doesn't look so good, does it.

IIRC, petreus's strategy would require 650K US troops. he's using the bush strategy instead, which i'm sure he sees as equal or superior to his own.

benjoya wrote on June 14, 2007 1:34 PM:

If he can't control the insurgency using the strategies he outlined, that doesn't look so good, does it.

IIRC, petreus's strategy would require 650K US troops. he's using the bush strategy instead, which i'm sure he sees as equal or superior to his own.

yosemite wrote on June 14, 2007 1:45 PM:

"Petraeus has a deserved reputation for clarity and honesty, something I've observed firsthand on two occasions I've had to interview him."

May I suggest your powers of observation are insufficient to the task at hand.

nofltwlt wrote on June 14, 2007 1:46 PM:

Petraeus (betrayus) is right; it is astonishing because it is unlikely to be the truth.

Mark F. wrote on June 14, 2007 1:48 PM:

This is a classic case of lying without actually lying. We know there are "signs of normalcy" in Baghdad: water runs downhill, the sun is in the sky in the daytime, moon at night, etc. But as today's Pentagon report shows, there are also astonishing signs that the violence hasn't decreased even slightly--only moved to places where there are less troops.

Patraeus is a liar. A damn good one too.

Mark F. wrote on June 14, 2007 1:51 PM:

This is a classic case of lying without actually lying. We know there are "signs of normalcy" in Baghdad: water runs downhill, the sun is in the sky in the daytime, moon at night, etc. But as today's Pentagon report shows, there are also astonishing signs that the violence hasn't decreased even slightly--only moved to places where there are less troops.

Patraeus is a liar. A damn good one too.

Dr Wu , the last of the big-time thinkers wrote on June 14, 2007 1:59 PM:

big-time general lies like a rug. he too has a reserved seat on the rocket ship "new world" when it blasts out in 4 years as oil runs out...

Anonymous wrote on June 14, 2007 2:08 PM:

so if the "clear and honest" general drives around bagdad, he sees "astonishing signs of normalcy" in "perhaps half to two-thirds of the city"

so?

let's have some clear and honest talk about the military effort!

Samsara wrote on June 14, 2007 2:12 PM:

"Petraeus has a deserved reputation for clarity and honesty, something I've observed firsthand on two occasions I've had to interview him."

OK Spencer, I get the same vibe too, but Bush has put him in a position totally inappropriate for any U.S. military commander. U.S. Generals don't start wars, and they sure as hell shouldn't decide when to stop them. Bush, lacking any credibility of his own, has framed this as "let the general, not the politicians, make the decisions".

Petraeus will honestly report a mixed bag of facts, understandably emphasizing what our soldiers have accomplished.

Then we will see if the Rep. strategy of delay has worked, and if the American People have become so desensitized to American deaths as to let them continue through the end of Bush's Presidency.

JD wrote on June 14, 2007 2:20 PM:

When George W Bush walks downtown Baghdad hand in hand with Laura and isn't shot dead I'll say Iraq is a success. Until then if it looks like a duck and smells like a duck and walks like a duck Iraq is a total failure.

Ric Gerace wrote on June 14, 2007 4:31 PM:

How about when Little Georgie and Laura can walk hand-in-hand through a major American city, without their secret service army, and not get shot dead? Would that be normal or abnormal? These things are just so confusing. I think we should arm the ducks.

They might be moving to Albania in 2009, just to feel safe and warm.

jimbo92107 wrote on June 14, 2007 4:36 PM:

Any time Petraeus wants to drive a car around Baghdad without half a division to guard his ass, then he'll find out what's "normal" in Iraq.

I recommend a big, black limousine. Oh, and just to make sure, put a little American flag on the antenna.

harriett wrote on June 14, 2007 5:19 PM:

Where's the video? I'll believe it when I see it with my own eyes.

azbill wrote on June 14, 2007 6:47 PM:

If things are going that well in Iraq, then why the need for the "surge", General. You sound like Joe Lie-berman and John McLame when they went to the market with only 100 members of the military to protect them. Since we have virtually no press in Iraq then we have no way of knowing when the general is lying to us AGAIN.

Oh yes, if it's that safe then President and Mrs. "smokey" Bush need to go for a stroll around Baghdad WITHOUT A 100 TROOPS TO ESCORT THEM. THen and only then will I feel like I am being told the truth.

And general, I guess you have given up your military escort as well. Yea, right.

Elliot wrote on June 14, 2007 7:18 PM:

Petraeus did write the book on counter-insurgency and had "success" (see Fiasco) but was undermined by the LACK OF ENOUGH TROOPS!! and the constant rotation of units that had finally established a relationship with the locals. Once again we are playing Whack a Mole!
I am disappointed that he has not stated the need for many more troops over and beyond the Surge to achieve any kind of meaningful security. If only one senior commander on the field had said this early on we may not be in this complete mess

Elliot wrote on June 14, 2007 7:19 PM:

Petraeus did write the book on counter-insurgency and had "success" (see Fiasco) but was undermined by the LACK OF ENOUGH TROOPS!! and the constant rotation of units that had finally established a relationship with the locals. Once again we are playing Whack a Mole!
I am disappointed that he has not stated the need for many more troops over and beyond the Surge to achieve any kind of meaningful security. If only one senior commander on the field had said this early on we may not be in this complete mess

mikbee wrote on June 15, 2007 1:08 AM:

heatless and gutless military whore, better known as the great general patreus. to say what he said today, just shows that these human scum will sacrifice anything and anybody for their greedy political and finacial gain. it seems like this guy is in some other realm of reality where he attends his church and prays to his god and belives that what he is doing is good. these piss stains are not dumb! they know exacatly what they want to accomplish. work the dark side .

vuocxqrbg raob wrote on August 9, 2007 8:00 AM:

dxwk jarvpi nvpoa nxuvigc knavthlwe dglshmx lxirfj

vqrj decwfklqg wrote on August 9, 2007 8:01 AM:

rsuhabl ogeudkf vohuycd zipevyu cwqam iketzvuf vxdj http://www.ijxn.bkgdpwf.com

ubitdxmc jtoce wrote on August 9, 2007 8:02 AM:

wfyutmc myipdj puhyd hufljvzk qbfekay tzylgckwa hydztrg msvqz lzxjyp

Dimos wrote on September 8, 2007 5:40 AM:

Checking in to see if everybody.
This is super.
Checking in to see if everybody.
Moon Freddie.
Best site!
Ok! Beautyful.

Hubert wrote on September 8, 2007 6:39 AM:

Super!
Glad to see other.
Ok! Best regards!
I really enjoyed your page.
Ok! Best regards!
Thanks.

Minko wrote on September 8, 2007 7:30 AM:

Best site!
Sample design...
Fine!
Ok! Beautyful.
Is cool and to say hello.
And my grandpa is a train finatic.

Saeko wrote on September 8, 2007 8:49 AM:

Ok! Beautyful.
Ok! Best regards!
I really enjoyed your page.
Fine!
Is cool and to say hello.
Ok! Best regards!

Dimos wrote on September 8, 2007 9:04 AM:

And includes a wealth of information.
Best site!
I really enjoyed your page.
It's vonderful.
Sample design...
Thanks.

Diter wrote on September 8, 2007 10:02 AM:

It is very creative.
Looks interesting.
Super!
Best site!
It's vonderful.
I really enjoyed your page.

Iton wrote on September 8, 2007 10:22 AM:

It is very creative.
And includes a wealth of information.
It is very creative.
Thanks.
Ok! Beautyful.
Sample design...

Aqua wrote on September 8, 2007 10:37 AM:

Ok! Master!
The Best.

Robert wrote on September 8, 2007 10:48 AM:

Glad to see other.
I really enjoyed your page.

Markos wrote on September 8, 2007 11:14 AM:

The Best.
This is super.

Saeko wrote on September 8, 2007 11:27 AM:

It is very creative.
Super!

Aqua wrote on September 8, 2007 9:10 PM:

Its the second time.
Its the second time.

Tormoz wrote on September 8, 2007 9:26 PM:

And includes a wealth of information.
Super!

Freddie wrote on September 8, 2007 9:37 PM:

Ok! Best regards!
It's fine.

Dimos wrote on September 8, 2007 9:53 PM:

Ok! Beautyful.
It's fine.

Tormoz wrote on September 8, 2007 10:09 PM:

Super!
I really enjoyed your page.

Piton wrote on September 8, 2007 10:49 PM:

Ok! Beautyful.
Best site!

Rupert wrote on September 8, 2007 11:27 PM:

It's fine.
Ok! Best regards!

Dimos wrote on September 8, 2007 11:39 PM:

The Best.
Sample design...

Minko wrote on September 8, 2007 11:53 PM:

Moon Freddie.
This is super.

Saturn wrote on September 9, 2007 12:27 AM:

Fabulous Website!
I really enjoyed your page.

Robert wrote on September 9, 2007 4:25 AM:

And my grandpa is a train finatic.
Ok! Beautyful.

Tormoz wrote on September 9, 2007 4:57 AM:

Fine!
Thanks.

Tory wrote on September 9, 2007 5:11 AM:

Fabulous Website!
Ok! Best regards!

Cruger wrote on September 9, 2007 8:55 AM:

Sample design...
And my grandpa is a train finatic.

Robert wrote on September 9, 2007 9:07 AM:

I visited your web site.
Glad to see other.

Jim wrote on September 9, 2007 1:15 PM:

Glad to see other.
Checking in to see if everybody.

Minko wrote on September 9, 2007 1:30 PM:

Checking in to see if everybody.
Fine!

Diter wrote on September 9, 2007 1:46 PM:

Thanks.
It's vonderful.

Kranton wrote on September 9, 2007 2:07 PM:

Ok! Beautyful.
The Best.

Hovard wrote on September 9, 2007 2:38 PM:

This is super.
Best site!

Mooner wrote on September 9, 2007 2:49 PM:

Ok! Best regards!
Glad to see other.

Saeko wrote on September 9, 2007 3:00 PM:

It's fine.
I really enjoyed your page.

Eros wrote on September 9, 2007 3:13 PM:

Ok! Master!
Fine!

Pink wrote on September 9, 2007 3:23 PM:

Ok! Beautyful.
I visited your web site.

Saeko wrote on September 9, 2007 10:24 PM:

It's fine.
And includes a wealth of information.

20 million candle power spot lights wrote on September 20, 2007 4:39 PM:

Nice site. Thanks!!!

acrylic shower panel wrote on September 24, 2007 9:02 AM:

Very good site. Thanks.

acrylic shower panel wrote on September 24, 2007 9:03 AM:

Very good site. Thanks.

airline prague american united wrote on September 24, 2007 11:18 PM:

Nice site. Thank you.

airline prague american united wrote on September 24, 2007 11:19 PM:

Nice site. Thank you.

american car express insurance rental wrote on September 25, 2007 11:20 AM:

Good site. Thanks.

apple laptop video card wrote on September 26, 2007 1:41 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!!!

ashley millennium furniture in raleigh triangle nc wrote on September 26, 2007 11:48 AM:

Good site. Thanks:-)

asynja wrote on September 26, 2007 2:05 PM:

Good site. Thanks.

asynja wrote on September 26, 2007 2:05 PM:

Good site. Thanks.

barnes coupon code wrote on September 27, 2007 6:28 PM:

Good site. Thank you.

beckett football card prices wrote on September 28, 2007 4:09 AM:

Nice site. Thanks!!!

beckett football card prices wrote on September 28, 2007 4:09 AM:

Nice site. Thanks!!!

bench top ovens wrote on September 28, 2007 8:32 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!!!

bench top ovens wrote on September 28, 2007 8:32 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!!!

birmingham city football hooligans wrote on September 28, 2007 10:33 PM:

Good site. Thank you:-)

birmingham city football hooligans wrote on September 28, 2007 10:34 PM:

Good site. Thank you:-)

bmw motorcycle salt lake city wrote on September 29, 2007 8:48 AM:

Good site. Thanks:-)

bmw motorcycle salt lake city wrote on September 29, 2007 8:48 AM:

Good site. Thanks:-)

boss 1600 metronome wrote on September 29, 2007 4:37 PM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

Halloween Costume wrote on October 30, 2007 3:07 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!

costume halloween teen make wrote on October 30, 2007 7:14 PM:

Cool site. Thanks:-)

Generic Tadalafil wrote on October 31, 2007 1:38 AM:

Good site. Thank you!

David Bridal wrote on October 31, 2007 6:27 AM:

Cool site. Thank you!

Soma wrote on October 31, 2007 3:59 PM:

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Soma wrote on October 31, 2007 3:59 PM:

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Tramadol wrote on October 31, 2007 4:50 PM:

Very good site. Thanks!!!

Replica Watch wrote on October 31, 2007 5:48 PM:

Good site. Thank you:-)

Wedding Dress wrote on October 31, 2007 6:56 PM:

Very good site. Thank you.

Wedding Dress wrote on October 31, 2007 6:56 PM:

Very good site. Thank you.

JC Whitney wrote on October 31, 2007 9:03 PM:

Good site. Thank you.

Airplane Tickets wrote on October 31, 2007 9:56 PM:

Cool site. Thanks.

buy tadalafil wrote on October 31, 2007 10:57 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!

buy tadalafil wrote on October 31, 2007 10:57 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!

Viagra wrote on October 31, 2007 11:57 PM:

Nice site. Thanks:-)

Tramadol wrote on November 1, 2007 1:14 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!

buy tadalafil wrote on November 1, 2007 2:19 AM:

Good site. Thanks.

Valium wrote on November 1, 2007 4:22 AM:

Cool site. Thank you!

Ephedra wrote on November 1, 2007 6:35 AM:

Good site. Thank you.

Tadalafil wrote on November 1, 2007 7:52 AM:

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Viagra wrote on November 1, 2007 11:21 AM:

Very good site. Thank you.

Ambien wrote on November 1, 2007 1:33 PM:

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Home Depot wrote on November 1, 2007 8:00 PM:

Good site. Thanks.

Home Depot wrote on November 1, 2007 8:01 PM:

Good site. Thanks.

Tadalafil wrote on November 1, 2007 9:20 PM:

Cool site. Thanks!!!

Bowflex wrote on November 1, 2007 11:52 PM:

Nice site. Thank you:-)

JC Whitney wrote on November 2, 2007 3:55 AM:

Cool site. Thank you:-)

JC Whitney wrote on November 2, 2007 3:55 AM:

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Buy Tadalafil wrote on November 2, 2007 5:18 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

Buy Tadalafil wrote on November 2, 2007 5:18 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

Wedding Dresses wrote on November 2, 2007 5:42 AM:

Very good site. Thanks!

Replica Watch wrote on November 2, 2007 5:44 AM:

Good site. Thank you!

Viagra wrote on November 2, 2007 9:19 AM:

Good site. Thanks!

Coach Handbags wrote on November 2, 2007 4:50 PM:

Nice site. Thank you!

Curling Irons wrote on November 2, 2007 8:29 PM:

Very good site. Thanks.

Spyware Doctor wrote on November 2, 2007 10:11 PM:

Good site. Thank you.

Sex Video wrote on November 3, 2007 1:58 AM:

Good site. Thanks.

Buy Tadalafil wrote on November 3, 2007 3:22 AM:

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Viagra wrote on November 3, 2007 4:45 AM:

Cool site. Thanks.

Vicodin wrote on November 3, 2007 6:48 AM:

Good site. Thanks.


Buy Ambien wrote on November 3, 2007 7:07 AM:

Good site. Thanks:-)


Xanax wrote on November 3, 2007 7:18 AM:

Good site. Thank you!!!

Xanax wrote on November 3, 2007 7:18 AM:

Good site. Thank you!!!

Cheap Ephedra wrote on November 3, 2007 8:51 AM:

Very good site. Thanks!


Buy Tramadol wrote on November 3, 2007 11:18 AM:

Cool site. Thanks!


Discount Online wrote on November 3, 2007 12:20 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!


Discount Viagra wrote on November 3, 2007 1:28 PM:

Nice site. Thanks:-)

Discount Viagra wrote on November 3, 2007 1:29 PM:

Nice site. Thanks:-)

Buy Viagra wrote on November 3, 2007 2:40 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!!!

Misoprostol wrote on November 3, 2007 3:53 PM:

Nice site. Thank you!

Davids Bridal wrote on November 3, 2007 4:53 PM:

Cool site. Thanks.


Tadalafil Alternative wrote on November 3, 2007 5:51 PM:

Nice site. Thank you!!!


Dogbone wrote on November 3, 2007 6:49 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!

Rooster Lamp wrote on November 3, 2007 9:48 PM:

Very good site. Thanks.

Buy Viagra wrote on November 4, 2007 1:00 AM:

Cool site. Thank you.

Tramadol wrote on November 4, 2007 2:07 AM:

Nice site. Thanks!


Valium wrote on November 4, 2007 3:14 AM:

Good site. Thanks.


Valium wrote on November 4, 2007 3:14 AM:

Good site. Thanks.


Ephedra wrote on November 4, 2007 7:14 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!


Xenadrine Ephedra wrote on November 4, 2007 8:23 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!!!


Tramadol Online wrote on November 4, 2007 9:36 AM:

Cool site. Thanks.

Viagra For Women wrote on November 4, 2007 11:44 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!


Ultram wrote on November 4, 2007 1:05 PM:

Very good site. Thanks.


Tramadol wrote on November 4, 2007 2:38 PM:

Very good site. Thank you!


Ambien wrote on November 4, 2007 4:23 PM:

Cool site. Thank you.


Bridal wrote on November 4, 2007 6:07 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!!!

Ultram wrote on November 4, 2007 9:07 PM:

Cool site. Thank you!!!

Ambien wrote on November 4, 2007 11:34 PM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

Buy Futon wrote on November 5, 2007 1:48 AM:

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Foreign Currency wrote on November 5, 2007 3:56 AM:

Nice site. Thanks!!!

Levitra wrote on November 5, 2007 8:51 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!

Levitra wrote on November 5, 2007 8:51 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!

Free Sex Videos wrote on November 5, 2007 3:50 PM:

Nice site. Thank you!!!

Free Sex Videos wrote on November 5, 2007 3:50 PM:

Nice site. Thank you!!!

free porn video wrote on November 5, 2007 6:16 PM:

Good site. Thanks.


Adware Removers wrote on November 5, 2007 8:11 PM:

Very good site. Thank you.

USAirways wrote on November 5, 2007 10:27 PM:

Good site. Thank you:-)

us airways wrote on November 6, 2007 12:27 AM:

Good site. Thanks.

Spyware Removers wrote on November 6, 2007 4:11 AM:

Very good site. Thanks!!!

Spyware Removers wrote on November 6, 2007 4:12 AM:

Very good site. Thanks!!!

Stacker 3 Diet Pills wrote on November 6, 2007 6:12 AM:

Good site. Thank you!!!

Stacker 3 Diet Pills wrote on November 6, 2007 6:12 AM:

Good site. Thank you!!!

jc whitney compact cars wrote on November 6, 2007 5:06 PM:

Nice site. Thanks:-)

xanax generic wrote on November 7, 2007 2:04 AM:

Cool site. Thank you!


xanax 2mg phone order wrote on November 7, 2007 3:13 AM:

Good site. Thank you!


Generic Tadalafil wrote on November 8, 2007 4:18 AM:

Good site. Thanks!


Wedding Dress wrote on November 8, 2007 9:56 AM:

Very good site. Thanks!


Buy Tramadol wrote on November 9, 2007 1:18 PM:

Nice site. Thanks.


Buy Tramadol wrote on November 9, 2007 1:18 PM:

Nice site. Thanks.


Levitra Vardenafil wrote on November 9, 2007 6:47 PM:

Good site. Thanks.


Ephedra wrote on November 10, 2007 1:12 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

Ephedra wrote on November 10, 2007 1:13 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

Cheap Airfare wrote on November 10, 2007 8:39 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!


Cheap Airfare wrote on November 10, 2007 8:39 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!


Replica Watches wrote on November 10, 2007 11:20 AM:

Very good site. Thanks.


Replica Watches wrote on November 10, 2007 11:20 AM:

Very good site. Thanks.


Kitchen Cabinets wrote on November 10, 2007 5:46 PM:

Nice site. Thank you!!!


Buy Bowflex wrote on November 10, 2007 6:32 PM:

Good site. Thank you.


Sildenafil wrote on November 10, 2007 10:05 PM:

Nice site. Thanks!!!


Vardenafil wrote on November 11, 2007 2:12 AM:

Good site. Thank you!


Vardenafil wrote on November 11, 2007 2:58 AM:

Cool site. Thank you!


Sex Position wrote on November 11, 2007 8:04 AM:

Nice site. Thank you:-)


Spyware Remover wrote on November 11, 2007 9:14 PM:

Very good site. Thanks:-)


Spyware Remover wrote on November 11, 2007 9:19 PM:

Very good site. Thanks:-)


Kitchen Cabinets wrote on November 12, 2007 3:29 PM:

Good site. Thank you.


Discount Wedding Dress wrote on November 13, 2007 4:25 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

Tadalafil Tablets wrote on November 13, 2007 6:00 AM:

Very good site. Thank you!


Generic Tadalafil wrote on November 13, 2007 9:07 AM:

Good site. Thank you.


Penis Enlargement Pills wrote on November 14, 2007 8:36 AM:

Nice site. Thanks.


electronics and computer retail wrote on November 21, 2007 6:28 AM:

Good site. Thanks.

discount golf items wrote on November 21, 2007 10:44 AM:

Nice site. Thank you!!!

discount golf items wrote on November 21, 2007 10:45 AM:

Nice site. Thank you!!!

dynastar wrote on November 22, 2007 2:49 AM:

Very good site. Thanks!!!

parawire wrote on November 22, 2007 7:27 PM:

Nice site. Thanks.

parawire wrote on November 22, 2007 7:27 PM:

Nice site. Thanks.

Post a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address