« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
The Daily Muck
Colleagues Cite Partisan Focus by Justice Official
"Two years ago, Robin C. Ashton, a seasoned criminal prosecutor at the Department of Justice, learned from her boss that a promised promotion was no longer hers. 'You have a Monica problem,' Ms. Ashton was told, according to several Justice Department officials. Referring to Monica M. Goodling, a 31-year-old, relatively inexperienced lawyer who had only recently arrived in the office, the boss added, 'She believes you’re a Democrat and doesn’t feel you can be trusted.'" (NY Times)
All Eyes on Monica Goodling
"Former Justice Department official Monica Goodling has the opportunity to shed light on her key role in a firing process that has remained shrouded in mystery, despite the release of thousands of Justice Department e-mails and the testimony of a number of top officials. 'She's worked very hard,' says John Dowd, a lawyer for Goodling at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. 'She'll do her level best to be candid and forward in her testimony.' That promise isn't likely to reassure Gonzales or other Bush administration officials involved in the dismissal of at least eight U.S. Attorneys." (Legal Times)
Ex-US Attorney Questions Own Firing
"A former West Virginia federal prosecutor said Friday the White House fired him in 2005 in the middle of a corruption and vote-buying investigation but never told him why. Karl K. 'Kasey' Warner said he has 'concerns' and sees parallels between himself and eight other ousted U.S. attorneys. Congress and an internal Justice Department agency are investigating whether those firings were politically motivated. The Justice Department rejected any suggestion of politics in Warner's dismissal." (Associated Press)
Prosecutor of Shields Filed Motion
"Federal prosecutors want to keep the political controversy over U.S. attorney firings and resignations out of the upcoming mortgage fraud trial of Katheryn Shields and her husband. In documents filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Kansas City, prosecutors asked a judge to prohibit defense attorneys from telling jurors anything about the resignation of former U.S. Attorney Todd Graves or the appointment of his interim successor, Bradley Schlozman, who was in office when the case was filed. Shields, a Democrat and former Jackson County executive, and her attorney husband, Philip Cardarella, previously have alleged that the criminal case against them is politically motivated." (Kansas City Star)
Nevada Governor Won't Produce Receipts for Turkey Vacation
"Lawyers for Governor Jim Gibbons say they won't release documents that they say show the governor and his wife paid their share of a vacation the couple took with a federal defense contractor to Turkey. A spokesman for the lawyers confirmed Gibbons and his wife Dawn traveled to Turkey in 2000 with Fatih and Eren Ozmen, who own a military defense firm that sought millions in federal contracts while Gibbons was a congressman serving on the House armed services and intelligence committees." (Associated Press)
Ex-CIA Officials Pushed Millions in Secret Deals to Pal, Prosecutors Say
"A former top CIA official steered an aviation contracting opportunity worth $132 million to a longtime friend, despite his friend's lack of experience in the field, according to federal prosecutors. Onetime CIA Executive Director Kyle "Dusty" Foggo directed CIA employees to hire his childhood pal, Brent Wilkes, to provide covert civilian air travel for the agency, charge prosecutors in a new indictment. The indictment is an offshoot of the investigation into former congressman Randall "Duke" Cunningham, who is now serving an eight-year sentence on corruption charges." (ABC's The Blotter)
CREW Files Complaint Against Sen. Mel Martinez
"CREW filed a Federal Elections Commission (FEC) complaint today against Senator Mel Martinez (R-FL) alleging multiple egregious violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) and FEC regulations. The complaint is based primarily upon the Commission’s recent audit on April 17, 2007 of Martinez for Senate, which revealed that the campaign committee failed to comply with the most basic disclosure provisions of FECA and FEC regulations. During the course of the ten-month campaign, Martinez for Senate received no fewer than three written warnings from the Commission." (CREW)
Ethics Tremor Made GOP Rep. Jerry Lewis' Pedestal a Little Wobbly
"California Republican Rep. Jerry Lewis was sitting pretty when his 2006 bid for a 15th House term began. With his party then in the majority, Lewis was chairing the powerful Appropriations Committee. But at least one Democrat could be taken more seriously than most of Lewis’ past opponents. What is different this year is the flak that the entrenched incumbent has been receiving in the run-up to his next election. Lewis drew some new and unwanted attention last month, not because of new developments directly affecting him, but because of ethics controversies dogging two other House Republicans." (Congressional Quarterly)
Waxman Widens Pentagon Probe
"The chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee may include a massive military contract, plagued by rising cost estimates and design problems, in his wider investigation of federal contracting abuse at the Pentagon. In a letter obtained by The Hill, panel Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) last week asked Defense Secretary Robert Gates for documents related to the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV), an amphibious assault vehicle to be used by U.S. Marines in storming beachheads." (The Hill)
Alaska's Friends and Family Plan
"The Alaska Congressional delegation over the past several months has quietly intensified work to secure federal help in developing a sparsely populated area outside of Anchorage, an effort that could yield significant financial benefits for family members and current and former aides of the three Republicans, according to the Congressional Record and state and local land records. Although stymied in 2005 when Congressional reformers lampooned their “Bridges to Nowhere” earmarks, the delegation — made up of Republican Rep. Don Young and Sens. Ted Stevens and Lisa Murkowski — has continued to back a plan to develop the “Knik Arm,” a largely unpopulated region of Alaska that currently is difficult to access but could become a major new suburb of Anchorage if a bridge is ultimately built to it." (Roll Call)
Bank Files May Undercut Wolfowitz, Critics Say
"Documents circulating at the World Bank suggest that Paul D. Wolfowitz, the bank president, understood that his role in ordering a pay increase and promotion for his companion in 2005 might be seen as a conflict of interest but insisted on proceeding anyway, bank officials who are critics of Mr. Wolfowitz said Sunday. The officials, speaking on the eve of a fateful week for Mr. Wolfowitz’s efforts to remain head of the bank, said testimony and notes that Xavier Coll, vice president of human resources, provided to a bank committee investigating the matter supported the charge that Mr. Wolfowitz was aware of engaging in favoritism. One said the documents were 'devastating' to Mr. Wolfowitz’s case." (NY Times)
Ex-Ambassadors Seek Removal of Appointee
"A group of former U.S. ambassadors asked President Bush to remove the U.S. ambassador to Belgium on grounds the recess appointment of Republican donor Sam Fox undermines diplomatic posts worldwide. The White House was forced to withdraw Fox's nomination in March after Senate Democrats indicated they would block it. A week later, Bush appointed Fox, a Missouri businessman, while Congress was in recess. 'Appointing an ambassador after the nomination has been withdrawn, and before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has even considered the nominee, essentially renders the Senate's confirmation process irrelevant,' seven former diplomats wrote in a letter to Bush dated May 8. 'This has the potential to undermine the legitimacy of those who serve in these vital posts all around the world,' the letter said." (Associated Press)
Questions Raised About FBI's Informants
"Even as the FBI hails as a major success story its breakup of an alleged plot by "radical Islamists" to kill soldiers at Fort Dix, N.J., federal authorities acknowledge that the case has underscored a troubling vulnerability in the domestic war on terror. They say the FBI, despite an unprecedented expansion over the past 5 1/2 years, cannot possibly counter the growing threat posed by homegrown extremists without the help of two often unreliable allies. One is an American public that they lament is prone to averting its attention from suspicious behavior and often reluctant to get involved. The other is a small but growing army of informants, some of whom might be in it for the wrong reasons -- such as money, political ax grinding, or their own legal problems." (Associated Press)
Pentagon Opens Inquiry of Troop-Support Group
"The Pentagon is looking into complaints that Defense Department officials charged with building public support for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan might have engaged in improper fund-raising and unauthorized spending, officials said Friday. The inspector general is examining whether officials who run “America Supports You,” a three-year-old Pentagon program lauded by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, helped arrange a fund-raiser for a private foundation set up last December by former Bush administration appointees. The foundation raises money to help troops and their families." (NY Times)
Billions in Oil Missing in Iraq, US Says
"Between 100,000 and 300,000 barrels a day of Iraq’s declared oil production over the past four years is unaccounted for and could have been siphoned off through corruption or smuggling, according to a draft American government report. Using an average of $50 a barrel, the report said the discrepancy was valued at $5 million to $15 million daily. The report does not give a final conclusion on what happened to the missing fraction of the roughly two million barrels pumped by Iraq each day, but the findings are sure to reinforce longstanding suspicions that smugglers, insurgents and corrupt officials control significant parts of the country’s oil industry." (NY Times)
Lobbying Reform in Trouble?
"The AP reports that lobbying reform, one of the key planks in the 2006 Democratic campaign, is running into problems in the House. Specifically, four specific provisions are threatening to scuttle the whole process. If the Democrats want to distinguish themselves from the past six years of governance, they are going to have to pass these reforms." (Washington Monthly's Political Animal)
Padilla Case Has Changed a Lot in Five Years
"When federal prosecutors begin to present evidence Monday against terrorism suspect Jose Padilla, their case is expected to rest heavily on a single document: his alleged application to become an Islamic warrior. Nowhere in the indictment is there mention of the sensational charges leveled against Padilla when he was arrested at O'Hare International Airport in May 2002. Then-Attorney General John Ashcroft said U.S. agents had thwarted a plot between Padilla, who is a U.S. citizen, and top Al Qaeda figures to detonate a radioactive 'dirty bomb' or blow up apartment buildings in U.S. cities." (LA Times)

Comments (18)
bordersmuggler wrote on May 14, 2007 10:21 AM:One department official said an applicant was even asked, “Have you ever cheated on your wife?”
That might be the crowning statement of her hypocrisy.
If Monica thinks that all the relevant WH, Rove and RNC correspondence has been successfully destroyed, enabling her to make false statements on the stand, she had better think twice. It sounds like there are many in Justice just waiting for the opportunity to square with her.
asdf wrote on May 14, 2007 10:32 AM:Soon Monica will be the source of all feminine evil. She will become the second Eve, an out of control youngster who tricked the unwilling righteous.
I laughed out loud at the planted NYT story about Queen Monica yesterday. It sets the stage for her fall perfectly. No matter how often they run this scam, it works for them, every time.
It would be easy to feel sorry for the Martyr Monica, since she doesn’t know yet that soon she will be treated exactly how they consider her, like yesterday’s garbage. But I don’t feel any sympathy, she knows they are liars, she must know they feel no honor, not to her God, their country or to truth generally, but she serves them loyally anyway. Her fate is entirely of her own making.
paul wrote on May 14, 2007 10:36 AM:The questions about the firing of Karl K. 'Kasey' Warner help illustrate the lasting damage that's been done to the Justice Department by Gonzalez, Sampson, Goodling and the rest of their corrupt crew. If Warner was on Comey's list, it's quite possible that his firing was legitimate, but now we'll never know. By destroying DoJ's credibility, this administration has made all of its personnel actions and prosecutions (or decisions not to prosecute) subject to suspicion. They're protecting the guilty as well as injuring the innocent.
Anonymous wrote on May 14, 2007 10:41 AM:If Monica thinks those documents have been destroyed, it’s a safe bet they’ll never see the light of day.
Perjury is a win-win from her perspective. Experience teaches the chance that she would be prosecuted is less than zero. If by some incredible fluke, someone calls her on her lies, who would charge her anyway? If she were charged, the pardon is guaranteed on Jan. 19, 2007, so why worry?
The problem she doesn’t realize, is that once pardoned she will be treated by those she devoutly served as a prostitute. A shameful reminder of sin revealed. She is no Oliver North or Elliott Abrams; she is a girl, a soldier, completely fungible.
bordersmuggler wrote on May 14, 2007 10:49 AM:What seems to be completely overlooked by everyone is the role of John Ashcroft in the influencing of Goodling's activites.
Ashcroft was behind everything she did.
Ashcroft's role in this MUST be investigated.
Brooklynite wrote on May 14, 2007 10:50 AM:Typo of "colleague" in first headline.
TheraP wrote on May 14, 2007 10:54 AM:The only way she can truly redeem herself is to tell the truth.
Call me naive, but I am still counting on some kind of psychological/religious "breakdown" having occurred and a need to get herself "right" with the only one that counts - and that is not karl rove.
If she is a "true believer," then her allegiance is to God, not to rove. I'm hoping for that. I'm counting on it. I'm praying for it!
Dabb wrote on May 14, 2007 11:17 AM:The stage is set for Goodling. All she has to do is tell the truth. I have no feelings about her one way or the other except that if she's a Christian as she proclaims then she will tell the truth. Whether she goes to jail or not doesn't matter. She doesn't deserve anyone's sympathy nor hatred. She is just one of many that has decided to stomp on the Constitution....and honesty. She can't redeem herself. She can't undo the damage she has done. We want nothing from her except the truth. Then she can go on with her troubled and/or happy life. She doesn't deserve our care and/or thoughts one way or the other. The only thing she can give to this country now is the truth.
Steve5117 wrote on May 14, 2007 11:28 AM:As Joe Friday said,"The facts maam, just the facts", I for one am scared of what these people deem to be the truth.
Didn't JC say "I am the way, the truth and the light...?
When Monica promises to tell the truth I wonder what we'll hear?
asdf wrote on May 14, 2007 11:58 AM:TheraP-OK-You’re naïve.
Any doubt at all that the administration is certain that Goodling will sacrifice her immortal soul for them and swear to the veracity of a lie, was put to rest at last week’s Judiciary Committee hearing when Gonzales testified. The Republicans on that Committee are still frothing rabid partisans, if the election changed anything it made them more consumed. The war for the Republicans is against the Democrats, there is no greater evil. If the constitution goes down in battle, it is a small price to pay for Divine Republican victory.
There is just no way they would have rolled over on the immunity deal if it would hurt the administration, none. Every word Monica will testify is scripted, vetted, redacted, and approved.
Phill wrote on May 14, 2007 12:02 PM:Scooter Libby is looking at ten years in jail for his perjury. Monica is unlikely to want to join him.
Monica is going to find perjury a lot harder to square with her religious 'principles' than the obstruction of justice.
The panel already has all the evidence they need to know what happened, all they want from Monica is confirmation.
If Monica denies having talked to Rove she can be certain that Rove will contradict her when he is finaly forced to speak and then she will be facing perjury charges.
Monica only has three choices, blame Rove, blame Gonzalez or take the blame herself. The last is the only one that can put he behind bars.
Anonymous wrote on May 14, 2007 12:17 PM:Paris Hilton will spend more time in jail than Scooter Libby, bet the farm.
Scooter’s name has been added to the list of Republican felons who will be given a pardon in January 2009. Does anyone seriously doubt that the appeals will not drag on until the pardon is issued?
Monica has no jail worries. First, there is no one to prosecute her; Fitzgerald’s assignment came by way of Comey, a mistake like that won’t happen again. Second, she will suffer the same amnesia that afflicts all administration officials, none of them are in legal jeopardy for lying to Congress. Third, she could easily drag any prosecution out until her pardon is issued.
Englischlehrer wrote on May 14, 2007 2:10 PM:I am naive, I guess, I can't believe that she had her laywer get her immunity and then she lies. That seems like a good way to go to jail.
Can you be tried for another crime on a related incident after being pardoned?
Is her testimony on Cspan as well? What day is it? time?
mbbsdphil wrote on May 14, 2007 2:25 PM:It's a "trust problem" only when you want to do something you don't want the public, or even Democratic members of Congress to know about. Or if it's something illegal.
But Monica was not hiring altar boys, whom it might be legal to insist are actually Catholic. She wasn't hiring Christian Broadcasting Corporation staffers, whom it might be legal to insist are fundamentalists with a high tolerance for hypocrisy and a gag mechanism that no longer works. She wasn't hiring missionaries or even partisan hit men and women.
Monica was hiring public employees for federal civil service jobs. Her process was illegal. Her use immunity should not be an absolute bar to prosecuting her for intentional serial violations of the law.
mac2151 wrote on May 14, 2007 2:43 PM:Is Steve Albrecht of the SEIU Master Trust (the border guard's union), who supposedly endorsed the "41 pages" against Carol Lam, a relative of Duke Cunningham's first wife?
asdf wrote on May 14, 2007 3:01 PM:“I am naive, I guess, I can't believe that she had her laywer get her immunity and then she lies. That seems like a good way to go to jail.”
Eric wrote on May 14, 2007 3:03 PM:The purpose of the immunity was SO she could lie. What her lawyer knows or doesn’t know is irrelevant. Monica is a member of the Bushie faith. Her place in heaven will be assured when she accepts responsibility for all the merely mortal criminal acts related to the scandal. At her alter the Truth isn’t found in what actually happened, the real Truth is found in how great a sacrifice she is willing to make to protect her Lord, the God Republican, and Its son on earth, George Bush. She, and the others like her, make no distinction between the administration and their sectarian religious faith, the two are the same.
Did anyone catch the Bill Moyers Journal this past friday? He interviewed graduates from Regency University. His interview is the perfect showcase of how to get these selfrightous "practioners of law" to paint themselves into a corner. Let's hope our elected officals will prepare better for Ms. Goodling then they did for the AG! "Oh please Mr. AG, you have to tell us something!" What kind of spineless crap was that!
Steve5117 wrote on May 14, 2007 3:04 PM:asdf
Amen, brother