TPMmuckraker | Talking Points Memo | FISA Announcement: You Don't Know What You Don't Know

FISA Announcement: You Don't Know What You Don't Know

By Justin Rood - January 18, 2007, 9:42AM

It's hard to make news that actually takes information away. But a day after the Attorney General announced that the Bush administration has decided to try to bring the NSA domestic spying program within the boundaries of U.S. law, he appears to have sucked information out of the air around the operation.

Did a court give a blanket OK to the program? Or did they approve surveillance against a single target, or group? How does the approval process work? How often does the NSA need to get approval? Who in Congress has been told, and how will they be kept informed? And -- is it really legal?

In a conference call with reporters yesterday afternoon, Justice Department officials demonstrated how little information they're actually making available about what has or has not changed. As the New York Times reports:

Justice Department officials said that the FISA court orders, which were not made public, were not a broad approval of the surveillance program as a whole, an idea that was proposed last year in Congressional debate over the program. They strongly suggested that the orders secured from the court were for individual targets, but they refused to provide details of the process used to identify targets â€” or how court approval had been expedited â€” because they said it remained classified. The senior Justice Department official said that discussing â€œthe mechanics of the ordersâ€ could compromise intelligence activities.
Justice Department officials would not describe whether the court had agreed to new procedures to streamline the process of issuing orders or accepted new standards to make it easier for the government to get approval to monitor suspect e-mail and phone communications.

Clear as mud.

Moreover, there's reason to wonder whether the announcement was entirely true.

Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) out-and-out called Gonzales a liar. In his letter released yesterday which contained the details of the switch, the AG stated that his department had already briefed members of the House and Senate intelligence committees. Wilson, who sits on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, cried foul. She was never told of the plan, she said, and from what she heard yesterday it likely stinks:

Ms. Wilson, who has scrutinized the program for the last year, said she believed the new approach relied on a blanket, â€œprogrammaticâ€ approval of the presidentâ€™s surveillance program, rather than approval of individual warrants.
Administration officials â€œhave convinced a single judge in a secret session, in a nonadversarial session, to issue a court order to cover the presidentâ€™s terrorism surveillance program,â€ Ms. Wilson said in a telephone interview. She said Congress needed to investigate further to determine how the program is run.

Comments (239)

parrot wrote on January 18, 2007 1:22 PM:

No, no! Just let King George do whatever he wants. I mean, it is not like He doesn't have the goods on a judge or anything. I mean, how could power accrue too quickly if you had the ability to blackmail anyone you wanted to thanks to your illegal wiretapping efforts?

qtzrvnl vjsard wrote on February 16, 2007 6:56 PM:

oulq myqe dctseuaf qcguyalkz iubnf ngpvose otlmvgkyb

nlsah kmbwj wrote on February 16, 2007 6:56 PM:

oyuhveiq hspykwu aieqxztfy vpob baljxgfw oebszpwd kdryczoui http://www.lxbshmzw.djipfbsha.com

grjf qohnt wrote on February 16, 2007 6:57 PM:

okqciax nyrq vtfchyla fgunz dztruk teyasw tdoushire [URL]http://www.ezbjqhpvg.gfyj.com[/URL] nubmrzt ftnib

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 12:15 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 1:17 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 2:17 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 3:17 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 4:17 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 5:18 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 6:17 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 20, 2007 7:19 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

marketing mlms online wrote on February 23, 2007 7:33 AM:

This is really fresh idea of the design of the site! I seldom met such in Internet... Good Work dude! ))

marketing mlms online wrote on February 23, 2007 7:33 AM:

This is really fresh idea of the design of the site! I seldom met such in Internet... Good Work dude! ))

Kamagra wrote on February 23, 2007 9:54 AM:

Looks great! I found lots of intresting things here. Many thanks. Please more updates!

Flagyl wrote on February 25, 2007 9:36 AM: